|
From: Kevin A. <al...@se...> - 2002-01-18 07:19:56
|
> > At the end of it all, I find I still prefer PythonCard. > > Yes, yes, yes! > > I guess I must have missed the beginning of this discussion, but can > someone please sum up (preferrably in a sentence or two) why we > wouldn't want to use that name? IMO it has a lot going for it... Danny Goodman put it this way: "This thread gets me off my duff because I think the card-ness of PythonCard's name and any metaphor used to describe its components shackles it with too much baggage (both good and bad). Those who know HyperCard well will have certain expectations that PythonCard is not intended to meet; those who may have only heard of HyperCard will feel like they have to know something else before getting to know PythonCard. Hemispherical-floating-arm computers notwithstanding, anything that conjures up "Apple" in non-Apple users'/programmers' minds is not a plus for the promotion of a new OS-platform-independent technology, IMHO. If it's a good authoring environment, it will attract old 'Card farts, like me (...and hi, Dan!) even if you name it something that would get bleeped on "South Park." And Kevin will be able to spend more time explaining what it is, rather than defending what it isn't." ka |