[MinGW-notify] [ mingw-Bugs-830692 ] Local object don`t destroyed when longjmp call

Bugs item #830692, was opened at 2003-10-26 14:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by earnie
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=830692&group_id=2435

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
>Category: non-mingw
>Group: Aged issue
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Shura Zam (debil_urod)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Local object don`t destroyed when longjmp call

Initial Comment:
Local object don`t destroyed when longjmp call

I tested it by
Os WinXP
g++ (GCC) 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1)
=====longjmp.cpp=====
#include <iostream>
#include <setjmp.h>

using std::cout;
using std::endl;

jmp_buf jmpb;

struct ex_test {
  ex_test(const char* msg);
  ~ex_test();
  private:
    const char* msg;
};//ex_test

ex_test::ex_test(const char* msg) : 
  msg(msg) {
  cout<<"ex_test::ex_test(char*): "<<msg<<endl;
}
ex_test::~ex_test() {
  cout<<"ex_test::~ex_test(): "<<msg<<endl;
}

void jmp() {
  static const char* msg = "3 jamp raised";
  ex_test _(msg);
  longjmp(jmpb, 1);
}

void test() {
  static const char* msg = "2 jamp test";
  ex_test _(msg);
  jmp();
}

int main() {
  if (!setjmp(jmpb)) { 
    static const char* msg = "1 set jamp buf";
    ex_test _(msg);
    test();
  } else {
    static const char* msg = "4 jamp from buf";
    ex_test _(msg);
  }
  return 0;
}
=====command line=======
c:\g++ -Wall -olongjmp longjmp.cpp
c:\longjmp.exe
=====output============
ex_test::ex_test(char*): 1 set jamp buf
ex_test::ex_test(char*): 2 jamp test
ex_test::ex_test(char*): 3 jamp raised
ex_test::ex_test(char*): 4 jamp from buf
ex_test::~ex_test(): 4 jamp from buf
=====output============

Destructor call only one object of four.
This conflict by ISO/IEC:14882 #18.7/4

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Earnie Boyd (earnie)
Date: 2013-01-11 09:30

Message:
If this is still an issue please take the concern to the GCC or binutils
bugs frameworks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=830692&group_id=2435