<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 84: UML Class diagrams...</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/</link><description>Recent changes to 84: UML Class diagrams...</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:01:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>UML Class diagrams...</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice for users to have UML class disgrams &lt;br /&gt;
for more complex parts of WACT where the package is &lt;br /&gt;
made from many files / classes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;class disgrams would be good for the template system, &lt;br /&gt;
and things like the CRUD example. It would make it &lt;br /&gt;
easier for people to understand as they would not have &lt;br /&gt;
to analysis lots of open files to understand how classes &lt;br /&gt;
communicate. This would help with people who might &lt;br /&gt;
think about writing things like Filters, and Component &lt;br /&gt;
Tags.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sequence Diagrams would also be helpful too. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-- Jason&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:01:05 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netf519068259a924063fbc23fdb43fce06916b0666</guid></item></channel></rss>