<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 84: UML Class diagrams...</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/</id><updated>2004-08-22T12:01:05Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 84: UML Class diagrams...</subtitle><entry><title>UML Class diagrams...</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/wact/feature-requests/84/" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-08-22T12:01:05Z</published><updated>2004-08-22T12:01:05Z</updated><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netf519068259a924063fbc23fdb43fce06916b0666</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice for users to have UML class disgrams &lt;br /&gt;
for more complex parts of WACT where the package is &lt;br /&gt;
made from many files / classes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;class disgrams would be good for the template system, &lt;br /&gt;
and things like the CRUD example. It would make it &lt;br /&gt;
easier for people to understand as they would not have &lt;br /&gt;
to analysis lots of open files to understand how classes &lt;br /&gt;
communicate. This would help with people who might &lt;br /&gt;
think about writing things like Filters, and Component &lt;br /&gt;
Tags.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sequence Diagrams would also be helpful too. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-- Jason&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>