<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/odforceplugins/feature-requests/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/odforceplugins/feature-requests/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/odforceplugins/feature-requests/</id><updated>2006-02-23T18:24:53Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to feature-requests</subtitle><entry><title>Support Other RBD Systems?</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/odforceplugins/feature-requests/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2006-02-23T18:24:53Z</published><updated>2006-02-23T18:24:53Z</updated><author><name>Daniel Kramer</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/danielkramer/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netb5b4ae16baab68033b74c8be36e508e45600e9ca</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are other free libraries out there.  This Solver&lt;br /&gt;
could support them all (have an optionbox to choose the&lt;br /&gt;
internal solver).. or we can split off seperate solver&lt;br /&gt;
nodes.  Depends on how similar the API's are I guess. &lt;br /&gt;
Not a high priority, something to think about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here are some other libs out there:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://physicsengine.com/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://physicsengine.com/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.tokamakphysics.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.tokamakphysics.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.continuousphysics.com/Bullet/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.continuousphysics.com/Bullet/&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>