This list is closed, nobody may subscribe to it.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(47) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(43) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(86) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(116) |
Sep
(87) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(93) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(122) |
Feb
(139) |
Mar
(170) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(60) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(86) |
Sep
(106) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(43) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(63) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(95) |
Apr
(98) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(71) |
Sep
(45) |
Oct
(88) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(50) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(100) |
Feb
(72) |
Mar
(71) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(76) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(158) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(95) |
Apr
(170) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(59) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(50) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(101) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(87) |
May
(132) |
Jun
(92) |
Jul
(135) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(72) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(82) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(75) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(69) |
Sep
(82) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(51) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(66) |
Apr
(54) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(50) |
Jul
(84) |
Aug
(86) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(71) |
Nov
(124) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(60) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(137) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(168) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(50) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(54) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2000-12-01 19:05:28
|
Bug #123780, was updated on 2000-Nov-29 01:45 Here is a current snapshot of the bug. Project: MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows Category: binutils Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Bug Group: None Priority: 4 Submitted by: Zastai Assigned to : pfalcon Summary: (Re-Submission) Common symbols Details: I'm using a i686-pc-linux-gnu-to-i386-pc-mingw32 cross-compiler, with binutils 2.10.1. I've applied the gcc patches as suggested, and I applied the very few parts of the binutils 2.9.4 patches that aren't in the stock 2.10.1 distribution yet. I recompiled the binutils for i386-pc-mingw32, and recompiled the cross-compiler as well. The results are the same as before: common symbols do not work properly, requiring the -fno-common switch to the compiler. Particular case: the GNU getopt that comes with the stock glibc of RedHat Linux 6.2. Its global 'optarg' variable isn't initialized, which causes it to be marked as a common symbol. When this variable is set in code, its value doesn't change (stays zeroed out); this results in a crash, as the program using getopt rightly expects optarg to be non-null when handling an option with a required parameter. The same problem applies to other global unitialized variables. The problem probably lies in binutils, though it could be a gcc issue. It's easy enough to add -fno-common in the specs file, but I'd rather see this solved another way. Follow-Ups: Date: 2000-Dec-01 11:05 By: pfalcon Comment: As was suggested, try CVS binutils. There were reports of problems with 2.10.1, which weren't with 2.9.4 or 2.10.91 ------------------------------------------------------- For detailed info, follow this link: http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=123780&group_id=2435 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2000-12-01 19:05:24
|
Bug #123780, was updated on 2000-Nov-29 01:45 Here is a current snapshot of the bug. Project: MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows Category: binutils Status: Open Resolution: None Bug Group: None Priority: 5 Submitted by: Zastai Assigned to : Nobody Summary: (Re-Submission) Common symbols Details: I'm using a i686-pc-linux-gnu-to-i386-pc-mingw32 cross-compiler, with binutils 2.10.1. I've applied the gcc patches as suggested, and I applied the very few parts of the binutils 2.9.4 patches that aren't in the stock 2.10.1 distribution yet. I recompiled the binutils for i386-pc-mingw32, and recompiled the cross-compiler as well. The results are the same as before: common symbols do not work properly, requiring the -fno-common switch to the compiler. Particular case: the GNU getopt that comes with the stock glibc of RedHat Linux 6.2. Its global 'optarg' variable isn't initialized, which causes it to be marked as a common symbol. When this variable is set in code, its value doesn't change (stays zeroed out); this results in a crash, as the program using getopt rightly expects optarg to be non-null when handling an option with a required parameter. The same problem applies to other global unitialized variables. The problem probably lies in binutils, though it could be a gcc issue. It's easy enough to add -fno-common in the specs file, but I'd rather see this solved another way. Follow-Ups: Date: 2000-Dec-01 11:05 By: pfalcon Comment: As was suggested, try CVS binutils. There were reports of problems with 2.10.1, which weren't with 2.9.4 or 2.10.91 ------------------------------------------------------- For detailed info, follow this link: http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=123780&group_id=2435 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2000-11-29 09:38:09
|
Bug #123780, was updated on 2000-Nov-29 01:45 Here is a current snapshot of the bug. Project: MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows Category: binutils Status: Open Resolution: None Bug Group: None Priority: 5 Summary: (Re-Submission) Common symbols Details: I'm using a i686-pc-linux-gnu-to-i386-pc-mingw32 cross-compiler, with binutils 2.10.1. I've applied the gcc patches as suggested, and I applied the very few parts of the binutils 2.9.4 patches that aren't in the stock 2.10.1 distribution yet. I recompiled the binutils for i386-pc-mingw32, and recompiled the cross-compiler as well. The results are the same as before: common symbols do not work properly, requiring the -fno-common switch to the compiler. Particular case: the GNU getopt that comes with the stock glibc of RedHat Linux 6.2. Its global 'optarg' variable isn't initialized, which causes it to be marked as a common symbol. When this variable is set in code, its value doesn't change (stays zeroed out); this results in a crash, as the program using getopt rightly expects optarg to be non-null when handling an option with a required parameter. The same problem applies to other global unitialized variables. The problem probably lies in binutils, though it could be a gcc issue. It's easy enough to add -fno-common in the specs file, but I'd rather see this solved another way. For detailed info, follow this link: http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=123780&group_id=2435 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2000-11-28 20:06:40
|
Bug #123735, was updated on 2000-Nov-28 12:13 Here is a current snapshot of the bug. Project: MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows Category: w32api Status: Open Resolution: None Bug Group: None Priority: 5 Summary: winuser.h: IDC_HAND missing Details: winuser.h: #define IDC_HAND MAKEINTRESOURCE(32649) is missing from header. Cheers, Mark Jordan. mar...@ie... For detailed info, follow this link: http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=123735&group_id=2435 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2000-11-28 20:06:34
|
Patch #102570 has been updated. Project: mingw Category: contributions Status: Open Summary: dll-examples ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=102570&group_id=2435 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2000-11-28 04:18:44
|
Task #21424 has been updated. Project: MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows Subproject: Public Process Summary: Set up '-fnative-struct by default' poll Percent Complete: 80% Status: Open Description: Set up poll for inclusin -fnative-struct into the gcc spec file. This should have enough priority, so we have it decided to the gcc-2.95.2-1 re-release. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2000-Nov-25 11:44 By: pfalcon Comment: To do: write summary and post survey announcement ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=21424&group_id=2435&group_project_id=5532 |