<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 2: Allow multiple "FromItem" elements in "from" clause</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/jsqlparser/feature-requests/2/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/jsqlparser/feature-requests/2/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/jsqlparser/feature-requests/2/</id><updated>2009-11-07T17:14:12Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 2: Allow multiple "FromItem" elements in "from" clause</subtitle><entry><title>Allow multiple "FromItem" elements in "from" clause</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/jsqlparser/feature-requests/2/" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-11-07T17:14:12Z</published><updated>2009-11-07T17:14:12Z</updated><author><name>Raskolnikov</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/jjoos/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.nete896a580a0126dff594c97507cf1f2e72e2bfe7e</id><summary type="html">In most databases, a join query can also be written as a "where" condition referring to multiple "from" items. \(example: select t1.a, t2.b from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id\). This is currently not supported since only one FromItem can be inspected \(FromItem PlainSelect.getFromItem\(\)\). It would increase the usefulness if multiple "from" items would be allowed \(List PlainSelect.getFromItemList\(\)\).
</summary></entry></feed>